WILLIAMSVILLE, N.Y.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jul. 29, 2013--
Seneca Resources Corporation (“Seneca”), the wholly owned exploration
and production subsidiary of National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE: NFG)
(“National Fuel” or the “Company”) reports that its production volumes
for its fiscal third quarter ended June 30, 2013 totaled 34.1 billion
cubic feet equivalent (“Bcfe”), a 54% increase over the prior year’s
third quarter. This was also an 18% increase over the quarter ended
March 31, 2013.
Seneca’s total production of 34.1 Bcfe, or 374 million cubic feet
equivalent (“MMcfe”) per day, was driven by significant natural gas
production growth from its new Marcellus Shale wells in Lycoming County,
Pa. Natural gas production increased 67%, to a total of 29.8 Bcf, while
crude oil production totaled 709,000 barrels, which was a decrease of
1.6% from the prior year. The decrease in crude oil production is a
result of a continued constraint in a third-party pipeline used to
transport associated natural gas production within the Sespe Field. This
is expected to be resolved by the end of December 2013.
Guidance Update
As a result of better than projected performance of its Marcellus Shale
assets, the Company is increasing its fiscal 2013 production guidance to
a range of 118 to 124 Bcfe. The previous guidance range was 110 to 118
Bcfe. The Company is also increasing its fiscal 2014 production guidance
to a range of 134 to 146 Bcfe, which is an increase from the previous
range of 132 to 142 Bcfe. Seneca expects production will remain
relatively flat quarter to quarter until the second half of fiscal year
2014 when several new pads are turned into sales.
Operations Update
As part of its Marcellus Shale delineation drilling program in fiscal
2013, Seneca previously tested one well in the Rich Valley prospect area
in Cameron County, Pa., with a peak 7-day production rate of 7.8 MMcf
per day, which at the time represented the highest rate of a
Seneca
Marcellus
well within its legacy acreage. This well had a treatable
lateral length of 6,372’ and was completed utilizing a reduced cluster
spacing (“RCS”) design.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, Seneca tested four additional
wells in three geographically distinct locations. These wells achieved
24-hour peak production rates ranging from 4.8 to 8.9 MMcfe per day.
They are currently shut-in awaiting the completion of production
infrastructure. At this time, three additional delineation wells still
await testing. Details on each of the wells in the fiscal 2013 Marcellus
delineation drilling program can be found in the table below.
Two of the wells tested during the third quarter are located in the
Clermont prospect area in Elk County, Pa. This is adjacent to the Rich
Valley prospect area where the previously mentioned delineation well is
located.
The two Clermont wells were drilled side-by-side in order to test the
effectiveness of the RCS completion design. The well completed with RCS
tested at a peak 24-hour production rate of 8.9 MMcf per day and the
well completed without RCS tested at a peak 24-hour production rate of
6.6 MMcf per day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prospect Area
|
|
|
|
County (Pa.)
|
|
|
|
Stages
|
|
|
|
Treatable
Lateral
Length
|
|
|
|
Reduced
Cluster
Spacing
|
|
|
|
24-Hour
Peak
Production
(MMcfe)
|
|
|
|
Normalized
Production
(MMcfe per 1,000’)
|
|
|
|
Status
|
|
Rich Valley
|
|
|
|
Cameron
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
6,372’
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
Producing
|
|
Clermont (9H)
|
|
|
|
Elk
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
5,500’
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
Tested
|
|
Clermont (10H)
|
|
|
|
Elk
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
5,565’
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
Tested
|
|
Ridgway
|
|
|
|
Elk
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
5,537’
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
Tested
|
|
Church Run
|
|
|
|
Elk
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
4,435’
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
Tested
|
|
Owl’s Nest (54H)
|
|
|
|
Elk
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
6,137’
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed
|
|
Owl’s Nest (59H)
|
|
|
|
Elk
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
5,370’
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed
|
|
Tionesta
|
|
|
|
Forest
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
5,100’
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald J. Tanski
, President and Chief Executive Officer of National
Fuel, stated, “Third quarter production was outstanding, and exceeded
our projections. Well results continue to improve, and our operational
efficiencies allowed us to bring multi-well pads on more quickly than
forecasted. This success has allowed us to increase our production
guidance for fiscal 2013 and 2014. Additionally, initial delineation
results in our Western Development Area were very positive. Along with
the first well in our Rich Valley prospect area, these four newly tested
wells further our confidence in a successful long-term Marcellus
development program across our vast legacy acreage position in
Pennsylvania.”
Additional information on the Company’s operations and financial results
will be discussed on the 3rd Quarter Fiscal 2013
teleconference which is scheduled for Friday, August 9, 2013 at 11:00 AM
ET.
National Fuel is an integrated energy company with $6.3 billion in
assets comprised of the following four operating segments: Exploration
and Production, Pipeline and Storage, Utility, and Energy Marketing.
Additional information about National Fuel is available at www.nationalfuelgas.com.
Certain statements contained herein, including statements identified by
the use of the words “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,”
“intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “projects,” “believes,” “seeks,” “will,”
“may” and similar expressions, and statements which are other than
statements of historical facts, are “forward-looking statements” as
defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, which could
cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those
expressed in the forward-looking statements. The Company’s expectations,
beliefs and projections contained herein are expressed in good faith and
are believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance
that such expectations, beliefs or projections will result or be
achieved or accomplished. In addition to other factors, the following
are important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements:
factors affecting the Company’s ability to successfully identify, drill
for and produce economically viable natural gas and oil reserves,
including among others geology, lease availability, title disputes,
weather conditions, shortages, delays or unavailability of equipment and
services required in drilling operations, insufficient gathering,
processing and transportation capacity, the need to obtain governmental
approvals and permits, and compliance with environmental laws and
regulations; changes in laws, regulations or judicial interpretations to
which the Company is subject, including those involving taxes, safety,
climate change, other environmental matters, real property, and
exploration and production activities such as hydraulic fracturing;
changes in the price of natural gas or oil; impairments under the SEC’s
full cost ceiling test for natural gas and oil reserves; uncertainty of
oil and gas reserve estimates; significant differences between the
Company’s projected and actual production levels for natural gas or oil;
governmental/regulatory actions, initiatives and proceedings; delays or
changes in costs or plans with respect to Company projects or related
projects of other companies, including difficulties or delays in
obtaining necessary governmental approvals, permits or orders or in
obtaining the cooperation of interconnecting facility operators;
financial and economic conditions, including the availability of credit,
and occurrences affecting the Company’s ability to obtain financing on
acceptable terms for working capital, capital expenditures and other
investments, including any downgrades in the Company’s credit ratings
and changes in interest rates and other capital market conditions;
changes in economic conditions, including global, national or regional
recessions, and their effect on the demand for, and customers’ ability
to pay for, the Company’s products and services; the performance of the
Company’s key suppliers counterparties; or economic disruptions or
uninsured losses resulting from major accidents, fires, severe weather,
natural disasters, terrorist activities, acts of war or cyber attacks.
The Company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date thereof.

Source: National Fuel Gas Company
National Fuel Gas Company
Analyst:
Timothy J.
Silverstein, 716-857-6987
Media:
Karen L.
Merkel, 716-857-7654